Carpal Instability

This is loosely based on Dr. Johnston’s presentation Jan. 15th.  If you were there, you know it was long  thorough.  My notes are not.  They are the quick and dirty approach to carpal instability.

Extrinsic Ligaments

Palmar ligaments are arranged like 2 vertically stacked ^ ’s.

This allows radial and ulnar deviation by tilting the ^ ’s to each side.

Dorsal ligaments are numerous ( like 20 or something ridiculous like that) – I try to remember 2 of them:

  1. DIC (dorsal intercarpal) – goes transversely from scaphoid to triquetrum.
  2. DRC (Dorsal Radiocarpal) – combination of Radio-Scapho-lunate and Radio-triquetral
  3. Also try to remember space of Poirier — area of weakness between Lunate & Capitate.

Intrinsic Ligaments

  • S-L, L-T most important.

Carpal Kinematics

Navarro – 3 column theory

Lichtman – oval-ring concept (N.B. think of perilunate dislocation pattern of injury)

Weber – 2 column theory (load-bearing and control)

Overall, just remember that distal row is rigid & functions as a unit

 

Force Transmission across wrist

 Midcarpal: 60% through C-S-L complex

Radiocarpal: Radioschapoid 50%, Radiolunate 30% Ulno-lunate 20%

Carpal instability

DEFINITION: loss of normal balance between carpal bones under physiologic loads through full ROM.

  • Associated with ABN Xfer of loads, ABN motion.
  • Watson’s Jack-in-the-Box theory.  ligament tear is like releasing a spring – the carpus assumes a more stable but abnormally aligned position.

CLASSIFICATION: 6 factors

  1. chronicity (acute, subacute, chronic)
  2. constancy (predynamic / dynamic / static)
    • dynamic vs. static
  3. etiology
  4. location
    • lateral (scapho trapezial, scaphocapitate, scapholunate, DII with SLD)
    • medial (triquetrohamate, VISI, triquetrolunate)
    • proximal  (Radiocarpal, Ulnocarpal)
  5. direction (DISI / VISI / UT / DT)
  6. Pattern (CID / CIND / CIC / CIA)
    • CID = malfunction of a joint between bones in the same row
      • proximal
        • scapholunate
        • lunotriquetral
      • distal

Pathomechanics

Direct & Indirect

Mayfield stages

  1. Scapholunate dissociation / scaphoid fracture
  2. Lunocapitate fracture
  3. Lunotriquetral disruption / triquetrum fracture (perilunate dislocation)
  4. Lunate Dislocation

Diagnosis

Clinical Exam – general rom, strength, watsons test

XRAY – 4views, n.b. alignment, look at scaphoid posture, triangular lunate = malrotation

many additional views possible, lots of signs (scaphoid ring, ring pole Taleisnik’s etc.) — just look at Gilula’s lines and at each bone.

– might also want to look at carpal height to 3rd MC height ratio (0.54)

 

Scaphoid tends to flex and pronate, triquetrum and lunate supinate and extend –> DISI

 

Scapholunate Dissociation

  • acute: closed reduction & perc. fixation  vs. ORIF & ligament repair +/- dorsal capsulodesis.
  • subacute: dorsal capsulodesis (e.g. Blatt, Herbert, Linscheid) vs. tenodesis (Linscheid, Almquist or Brunelli)
    • On exam – probably do Brunelli (split FCR routed through drill hole in scaphoid.) because unless you thought ahead, you probably incised the dorsal capsule and capsular ligaments, making the capsulodesis procedures difficult.

This is where my notes trail off.  I might have been post call or the presentation may have been too long for my attention span.  If you know what to do for L-T tears, write a comment.

8 Responses

  1. OCNA April 2001 p.233
    Greens carpal instability chapter 535-538

  2. DIC – may not technically be an extrinsic ligament – see Green’s chapter on the subject (andrew pointed out this nice bit of trivia)

  3. I am a patient who suffers from Mid Carpal Instability (MCI)/Palmar Midcarpal Instability (PMCI)

    & I’ve been suffering from this serious & complex wrist disability since: 13-10-2002,

    In December 2006 I set up my online support group for Mid Carpal Instability (MCI)/Palmar Midcarpal Instability (PMCI) Suffers.

    & It contains medical journals & websites on Mid Carpal Instability (MCI)/Palmar Midcarpal Instability (PMCI).

  4. Abstract: http://uk.msnusers.com/PalmarMidcarpalInstabilityPMCIRSD/Documents/Carpal%20Instability%20%28Musculoskeletal%29.%2013-01-2006..pdf

    This review addresses the pathoanatomical basics as well as the clinical and radiological presentation of instability patterns of the wrist.

    Carpal instability mostly follows an injury; however, other diseases, like CPPD arthropathy, can be associated.

    Instability occurs either if the carpus is unable to sustain physiologic loads (“dyskinetics”) or suffers from abnormal motion of its bones during movement (“dyskinematics”).

    In the classification of carpal instability, dissociative subcategories (located within proximal carpal row) are differentiated from non-dissociative subcategories (present between the carpal rows) and combined patterns. It is essential to note that the unstable wrist initially does not cause relevant signs in standard radiograms, therefore being “occult” for the radiologic assessment.

    This paper emphasizes the high utility of kinematographic studies, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR arthrography for detecting these predynamic and dynamic instability stages.

    Later in the natural history of carpal instability, static malalignment of the wrist and osteoarthritis will develop, both being associated with significant morbidity and disability.

    To prevent individual and socio-economic implications, the handsurgeon or orthopedist, as well as the radiologist, is challenged for early and precise diagnosis.

  5. http://uk.msnusers.com/PalmarMidcarpalInstabilityPMCIRSD/Documents/Understanding%20Mid%20Carpal%20Instability%20%28MCI%29-Palmar%20Midcarpal%20Instability%20%28PMCI%29%202006..pdf

    The concept of midcarpal joint instability (MCI) has evolved slowly since it was first described by Mouchet and Belot1 in 1934.

    Subsequent researchers have not agreed about whether the differing personal observations of MCI represent distinct clinical entities or rather different manifestations of the same (or very similar) conditions.

    Lacking unanimity in regard to the etiology and pathomechanics of this disorder it is easy to understand why there is also a lack of agreement on terminology and treatment for instability of the midcarpal joint.

    Even the name “midcarpal instability” is not accepted universally as the proper designation for this condition.

  6. Abstract: http://uk.msnusers.com/PalmarMidcarpalInstabilityPMCIRSD/Documents/More%20Documents%2FScapholunate%20Instability.%20From%20The%20University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20Orthopaedic%20Journal.%201999..pdf

    Scapholunate instability is the most common carpal
    instability.

    The evaluation and treatment of scapholunate instability is controversial and the outcome unpredictable.

    This article will review the pertinent ligamentous anatomy of the wrist and carpal kinematics.

    There will be a discussion of the clinical presentation,
    examination, and diagnostic testing of the patient suspected of having scapholunate instability.

    The treatment options and indications, including repair and reconstructive and salvage procedures, will be reviewed.

    Introduction:

    The most common carpal instability occurs between the scaphoid and lunate.

    Scapholunate instability may occur after a traumatic injury or from repetitive use.

    Patients often complain of weakness and pain of the wrist.

    The treatment options are multiple and controversial.

    This article will briefly review the pertinent wrist ligamentous anatomy, carpal kinematics, exam, and diagnostic evaluation for scapholunate instability.

    Treatment options and their indications will also be discussed.

  7. Abstract: http://uk.msnusers.com/PalmarMidcarpalInstabilityPMCIRSD/Documents/More%20Documents%2FDynamic%20Carpal%20Stability%20Department%20Of%20Orthopedics%20Mayo%20Clinic%20Rochester%20MN-USA%2011th%20Of%20June%202002..pdf

    The term carpal instability is commonly used, but what carpal stability actually is has not been defined.

    Much of the mechanically complex wrist’s versatility is due to the intercalated three bone proximal carpal row.

    Landsmeer described the collapse tendency associated with intercalated segments.

    The factors which provide static stability are the oblique alignment of the scaphoid, the obliquely aligned dorsal and palmar ligamentous complexs, the intrinsic perilunate ligaments, the transiting transcarpal tendons and the negative intraarticular pressure.

    The proximal carpal row adjusts its posture on the counterbalancing flexion/pronation torque exerted by the scaphoid and the extension/supination torque exerted by the triquetrum.

    The dynamic factors are the compressive force exerted across the joint acting on the joint surfaces and the effect of the bowstringing force provided by the flexor carpi radialis acting at the scaphoid tuberosity.

    The proximal carpal row has a tendency to translate ulnarly along the ulnarly sloped radial articular surface while the distal row has a tendency to slide radially on the radially sloped lunatatotriqueteral distal articular surface.

    This activity produces differential tension in the ligaments attaching to the triquetrum which effects an extension/supination stance of the triquetrum.

    The force couple acting on the scaphoid effects the flexion tendency of the scaphoid.

    The bowstringing of the flexor carpi radialis also counteracts scaphoid flexion.

    Alterations in any of these factors may upset the delicate mechanical balance of the joint.

  8. THE TREATMENT OF WRIST INSTABILITY – M. GARCIA-ELIAS- From the Institut Kaplan, Barcelona, Spain – INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE
    LECTURE.

    http://uk.msnusers.com/PalmarMidcarpalInstabilityPMCIRSD/Documents/More%20Documents%2FThe%20Treatment%20Of%20Wrist%20Instability..pdf

    The concept of carpal instability has evolved considerably
    over the past few years. Initially, the term ‘instability’ was
    considered to be synonymous with ‘malalignment’.1-3 A
    wrist was regarded as unstable when there was an alteration
    of the sagittal and/or anteroposterior alignment of the carpal
    bones beyond what was judged to be normal.4,5 Based
    on this, four major types of carpal malalignment were
    recognised:
    Dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI). The lunate,
    regarded as an intercalated segment between the distal row
    and the forearm bones, is abnormally extended relative to
    its proximal and distal links.
    Volar intercalated segment instability (VISI). In the sagittal
    plane the lunate appears abnormally flexed.
    Ulnar translocation. The proximal row is abnormally displaced
    (rotated or translocated) relative to the radius in an
    ulnar direction.
    Dorsal translocation. Due to a malunited fracture of the
    radius, the carpus is subluxed in a dorsal direction.
    These four types of instability could therefore always be
    diagnosed by plain radiography.6,7
    A number of authors including Schernberg8 and Zdravkovic,
    Jacob and Sennwald9 have criticised this concept of
    instability since not every alteration of carpal alignment is
    pathological. Wrists showing congenital hyperlaxity often
    appear to be grossly malaligned and yet are frequently
    asymptomatic. These patients are able to cope effectively
    with most activities of daily living and seldom require
    treatment.8,10 It was therefore necessary to reconsider the
    definition of instability and exclude those patients whose
    carpal malalignment is simply a variation of the normal. As
    a result, instability has been redefined as the inability to
    bear physiological loads with an associated loss of the
    normal carpal alignment.11,12
    This definition again was felt to be inadequate since it
    excludes those patients whose wrist is asymptomatic for
    most of the time, is well aligned and able to sustain
    physiological loads, but becomes painful only when performing
    a specific task, such as opening a jar or lifting
    heavy objects, with a typical sensation of ‘giving way’. It is
    apparent that there is dynamic instability, occurring when
    carpal malalignment appears sporadically under certain
    loading conditions, and static instability when malalignment
    is permanent regardless of the amount of load
    being applied.13,14
    By admitting differences in the severity of injuries producing
    carpal instability, some of the problems of definition
    were solved. Nevertheless, some concerns remained. By
    defining stability in terms of ‘ability to bear load’, the
    impression was gained that there was a problem only of
    load transfer (kinetic dysfunction) rather than of both load
    and movement (kinetic and kinematic dysfunction). For
    instance, a wrist with an old carpal collapse and extensive
    joint degeneration may bear physiological loads despite
    malalignment.15 Such cases, however, should be considered
    as pathologically unstable since their movement cannot be
    as smooth and well co-ordinated as that of a normally
    functioning wrist.16,17
    To fulfil these biomechanical criteria of stability, a normal
    wrist must be able to maintain a balance between the
    articulating bones in both kinetic and kinematic terms
    under physiological loads, through the whole range of
    movement.18,19 The term instability must be interpreted as
    ‘carpal dysfunction’,15 which implies that in a normal wrist
    there is the ability to transfer loads without sudden changes
    of stress on the articular cartilage (normal kinetics) and the
    capacity to move throughout the normal range without
    sudden alterations of intercarpal alignment (normal
    kinematics).

Leave a Reply